<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bryan&#8217;s Turbo NSX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>The car is a &#039;91 which I have owned since about 2002. It&#039;s been through a lot of constant changes since I first got it, which they didn&#039;t fully get into in the article. They completely skipped the fully built race motor and in fact, since this photoshoot (which was done a while back) the car has seen quite a few more changes; among them a full APR GT spoiler and a revised tune putting out 600 wheel hp.

As far as which is the best year NSX, it really depends on what you intend to do. If you want more of a track style car and plan to modify the car heavily, I highly recommend a &#039;91 or &#039;92. They are the lighest models by far as well as the least expensive. They still have non-powered steering so it has great road feel but loses some luxury touches. I would avoid the &#039;95-&#039;96 because they are heavier because they added the &quot;T&quot; top feature. However, the chassis and engine are the same as the &#039;91-&#039;92 so they are slower and have more body flex. 

If you are going to turbo the 3.0L engine of the &#039;91 to &#039;92 engine will be fine. However, if you plan on keeping it N/A you may want to consider the &#039;97+ where they switched to the 3.2L engine. If you are looking for something more refined, the &#039;02+ models upgraded some cosmetic effects (liked the fixed headlights vs. flip ups), but are a bit more expensive. You should be able to get a moderate milage &#039;91 for around $25K, but the &#039;02+ will be more than double that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The car is a &#8216;91 which I have owned since about 2002. It&#8217;s been through a lot of constant changes since I first got it, which they didn&#8217;t fully get into in the article. They completely skipped the fully built race motor and in fact, since this photoshoot (which was done a while back) the car has seen quite a few more changes; among them a full APR GT spoiler and a revised tune putting out 600 wheel hp.</p>
<p>As far as which is the best year NSX, it really depends on what you intend to do. If you want more of a track style car and plan to modify the car heavily, I highly recommend a &#8216;91 or &#8216;92. They are the lighest models by far as well as the least expensive. They still have non-powered steering so it has great road feel but loses some luxury touches. I would avoid the &#8216;95-&#8217;96 because they are heavier because they added the &#8220;T&#8221; top feature. However, the chassis and engine are the same as the &#8216;91-&#8217;92 so they are slower and have more body flex. </p>
<p>If you are going to turbo the 3.0L engine of the &#8216;91 to &#8216;92 engine will be fine. However, if you plan on keeping it N/A you may want to consider the &#8216;97+ where they switched to the 3.2L engine. If you are looking for something more refined, the &#8216;02+ models upgraded some cosmetic effects (liked the fixed headlights vs. flip ups), but are a bit more expensive. You should be able to get a moderate milage &#8216;91 for around $25K, but the &#8216;02+ will be more than double that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leoni</title>
		<link>http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>leoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jtuned.com/statics/bryans-turbo-nsx-3/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Bryan what year NSX did you get as a project car? Which year NSX do you recomend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan what year NSX did you get as a project car? Which year NSX do you recomend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
